![]() The present work is based on the premise that the autonomy of the feminist subject in India lacks the necessary space, having been subsumed within multiple discourses ranging from nationalist to postcolonial. The idea of the autonomy of the feminist subject was thus lacking in the Indian nationalist discourse. However, Spivak later clarified, stating that what she meant was that neither the British nor the Indian men actually understood the subject constitution of the woman standing at the pyre ( UC Berkeley, 2010). 93), which is often interpreted in terms of the imperial civilizing mission in India. One of the most cited essays in the field of feminist studies in India is Gayatri Spivak's Can the Subaltern Speak? (1987), where she claims that Sati was abolished in India as a result of “White men saving brown women from brown men” ( Spivak, 1987, p. Using these two approaches, an attempt is made to investigate the implications of the abrogation of Article 35A in terms of conceptualizing a case of autonomous space for Kashmiri women as democratic citizens of India. The second approach considers the narrative of Kashmiri women through detailed interviews to determine how they define their autonomy. The first approach is to carry out the discursive analysis of the autonomy of the feminist subject in India and Jammu and Kashmir. Based on multiple variables, the article employs a two-pronged approach. It accounts for women's positions throughout history, including the ancient monarchical system, which resulted in a syncretic Kasmiriyat tradition, the Dogra regime with its alliances and misalignments with British rule, and the violence of the Indian subcontinent's partition. Feminism and autonomy in Kashmir cannot be defined in isolation gender power relations intersect with the ethnic conflict of partitions as well as the militarization of Kashmir. The article uses the case study of Jammu and Kashmir and argues that women face triple jeopardy being subjected to multiple counter-discourses to their autonomy. It argues that the autonomy of the feminist subject in India has been subsumed within various other discourses, due to which the feminist subject of the discourse is still denied the necessary space. ![]() ![]() The article is centrally concerned with mapping out the autonomy of the feminist subject in India using the case study of Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 35A. Department of Political Science, Kamla Nehru College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |